 |
We Won a First Instance Judgment of 3.2 million yuan Compensation in Protecting a Design Patent for Our Client
|
|
 2019-01-07 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not design patents are similar and how to obtain a high damages compensation? Introduction: Panasonic Corporation owns a design patent facial steamer, which product, due to its novel, beautiful and stylish |
|
Bridgestone (JP) vs Gongniu (CN): Design patent infringement lawsuit(Selected in Annual 50 typical IP lawsuits by Supreme
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Introduction: How to determine the relationships among the existing prior design, the accused infringing product and patent involved while the defendant claims the defense of prior design. Abstract: This case involved the law application re |
|
Our firm Won the Invalidation of the Patent for Invention Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride and Sodium Chloride Injection
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Recently, Beijing Higher Peoples Court has made the final judgment to maintain the No. 20015 Invalidation Decision by the Patent Reexamination Board of SIPO, and all the claims of the patent Moxifloxacin hydrochloride and sodium chloride in |
|
We Successfully Sustained the Invention Patent “Pre-Coated Sand, Preparation Method Thereof and Composite Water Permeab
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not a claim is supported by the description, whether or not it is clear and whether or not it possesses inventiveness. Introduction: The petitioner filed a request for invalidation of the invention patent |
|
We Successfully Invalidated the Design Patent “Game Console (Magic Music Game Console II)” for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not a design patent have distinct differences over the prior design? Introduction: Entrusted by the petitioner of request for invalidation, Linda Liu Partners filed a request for invalidation of the design |
|
Linda Liu & Partners Successfully Sustained the Validity of a Design Patent for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: In determining whether or not a design patent is similar to prior designs, whether or not it has obvious effect on the prior designs from the overall visual effect shall be determined. Introduction: The petitioner filed a request for |
|
We Successfully Invalidated the Design Patent “Game Console (Magic Musical Game Console)” for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not a design patent have distinct differences over the prior design? Introduction: Entrusted by the petitioner of request for invalidation, Linda Liu Partners filed a request for invalidation of the design |
|
We Successfully Invalidated the Utility Model Patent “Control Circuit of Sewing Machine” for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not a claim possesses novelty and/or inventiveness over reference documents？ Introduction: A mechanical business company, as the first petitioner, and an enterprise, as the second petitioner, filed a req |
|
We Successfully Invalidated the Utility Model Patent “Additional Information Management System” for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine the obviousness of the technical solution of a claim? Introduction: The petitioner, a computer system company, filed a request for invalidation of the utility model patent named additional information management syst |
|
We Successfully Invalidated the Utility Model Patent “Button for Clothes” for Our Client
|
|
2017-07-05 |
| |
Guide: How to determine whether or not claims of a utility model patent possess inventiveness? Introduction: The petitioner filed a request for invalidation of the utility model patent named button for clothes (Patent No.: 201020137178.8), |
